Thursday, October 28, 2010

Stock Meeting 10-28-2010

Stock Meeting 10-28-2010

WES. Added to the Buy list, BT $27

WES: below average risk profile in natty gas. Fixed fee contracts. Would buy $27 and below.

Consumer stocks
Inflation is hidden in new packaging, lighter contents
Will look at ETF's as an alternative to individual equities

Novozymes have had a good run over the last couple of weeks
ITRI bought for MB & Ellen
Highwater has bought Canon
Chris has been buying Accretive Health

Brazilian investment foreign tax still some uncertainty

Next week:
Fed action
TIPS
discuss buy and watch lists, clean them up, add and remove tickers
Consumer ETF

Wednesday, October 27, 2010

Microsoft, it's so uncool, that's cool.

2000 revenues per share: $1.50 / Today: $7.50
2000 eps: $0.50 /  Today: $2.50
90% share in the applications market (most of you are using MSFT product to read this).
90% share in the O/S market.
Mobile: left for dead, negative value ascribed to the stock for this (Mobile 7? hmmmm).
Monster upgrade cycle underway for Win7, SQL Server, Xbox, Office.
Yeah, it's over for them.

MSFT is a Dying Consumer Brand

Highlights:

MSFT has been late to the game in mobile, search, media, gaming and tablets.  Now it’s falling behind in web browsing.  Bing has gained market share, but not at GOOG’s expense but at Yahoo!’s (MSFT’s partner)

MSFT has some of the best talent in the industry, they see the trends coming and begin researching it but they often miss their opportunity (example: iPad out for 7 months, MSFT is still sitting on the sidelines and several PC makers have already said they will not use Windows 7 as the OS, it’s not optimized for a tablet).  The race is to the swift—“you cannot afford to be an hour late or a dollar short.”

Xbox sold well to hard core gamers—along came Wii which snagged the casual gamer market.  Mobile phone didn’t do well and with 5% market share, developers aren’t feeling any pressure to step up and begin designing for the newest OS.

Windows 7 is the fastest selling OS in MSFT history.  To businesses.  Which put off buying PC’s or upgrading the Windows OS because Vista was so bug riddled and despised.

MSFT is at a crossroads.  It could be the next IBM—important to business but an afterthought to consumers.  But the market is different now and MSFT is eyeing the consumer market.  And consumers aren’t buying PC’s.  If Microsoft cedes consumer ground, it risks its enterprise stronghold—businesses are willing to let employees drive which devices they use and use their personal devices for work—which is increasingly becoming Mac’s, Androids, iPhones and iPads.

Microsoft is a dying consumer brand

Steve Ballmer, and the company he leads, are struggling with "the vision thing."  By David Goldman, staff writerOctober 27, 2010: 5:23 AM ET

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Consumers have turned their backs on Microsoft. A company that once symbolized the future is now living in the past. 

Microsoft has been late to the game in crucial modern technologies like mobile, search, media, gaming and tablets. It has even fallen behind in Web browsing, a market it once ruled with an iron fist.

Outgoing Chief Software Architect Ray Ozzie called out Microsoft's lost ground in a blog post over the weekend.  "Our early and clear vision notwithstanding, [competitors'] execution has surpassed our own in mobile experiences, in the seamless fusion of hardware & software & services, and in social networking & myriad new forms of internet-centric social interaction," he said.

It's not like Microsoft didn't foresee the changes ahead. With a staff of almost 90,000, the company has many of the tech world's smartest minds on its payroll, and has incubated projects in a wide range of fields that later took off. Experiments like Courier (tablets), HailStorm/Passport (digital identity), and Windows Media Center (content in the cloud) show the company was ahead of the game in many areas -- but then it either failed to bring those products to market, or didn't execute.

"In this age, the race really is to the swift. You cannot afford to be an hour late or a dollar short," says Laura DiDio, principal analyst at ITIC. "Now the biggest question is: Can they make it in the 21st century and compete with Google and Apple?"

Some influential analysts think not. Several have downgraded Microsoft's (MSFT, Fortune 500) stock in recent weeks, as PC sales continue to slow and Microsoft struggles with its tablet strategy.  The company's stock is down more than 17% this year.

What's wrong with Microsoft

A rundown of Microsoft's major consumer projects finds trouble in almost all of them.  Internet Explorer's popularity has been waning for years, and one recent study showed that for the first time in more than a decade, more people are using alternative browsers. The browser is becoming the single most critical piece of software on a device -- potentially eclipsing the operating system -- but all of the major innovations of the past few years, like tabbed browsing and add-on extensions, came from outside Microsoft.

Windows Phone 7 has promise, but Microsoft dug itself an enormous hole with the subpar Windows Mobile platform. With its market share currently sitting below 5%, developers are taking a "wait and see" approach.

0:00 /5:05Ballmer: Windows Phone 7 'different'

Microsoft's media platform Zune was dead on arrival.

Bing is growing, but substantially all of that growth has come at the expense of its business partner, Yahoo -- not its archrival Google.

Microsoft's attempts to build a social network through Windows Live have failed to gain traction. It has no real answer to Facebook.

Six months after Apple's (AAPL, Fortune 500) release of the iPad, Microsoft still has virtually no presence in the tablet market. And its strategy for taking on Apple -- Windows 7 on a tablet, rather than a tablet-specific operating system -- is leaving potential partners cold. Lenovo's technology director recently told PC Mag that his company won't be building around the platform: "The challenge with Windows 7 is that it's based on the same paradigm as 1985 -- it's really an interface that's optimized for a mouse and keyboard."

With Xbox, Microsoft succeeded at innovating: It created a competitive video game brand for hardcore gamers. But even Xbox was outdueled by Nintendo with the Wii, which outsold Xbox by appealing to casual gamers.

Then there's the epicenter of the Microsoft universe: Windows. Microsoft likes to point out that its operating system is its biggest consumer brand and Windows 7 has been selling rapidly. Its new version has sold 240 million licenses in a year, making it the fastest-selling OS in Microsoft's history.

But Windows' momentum isn't from consumers. In fact, consumers are a worry for the Windows division, because they have dramatically slowed their purchases of PCs in recent months.   Rather, the fast sales are coming from businesses, which significantly delayed their purchases of new Windows licenses because Windows Vista was bug-ridden mess. Then the recession hit. A years-overdue corporate PC refresh cycle is now happening all at once.

Meanwhile, Microsoft's executive suite is in turmoil. CFO Chris Liddel, entertainment unit head Robbie Bach, device design leader J Allard and business division chief Stephen Elop have left within the past year. Ray Ozzie joined the exit parade last week.

Consumers matter

Microsoft has a lot of questions to answer, and it will have an opportunity to do so at its Professional Developers Conference in Seattle, which kicks off Thursday.

But PDC, which used to be one of Microsoft's most important and widely attended conferences, is going to be relatively small this year, with only a few thousand people making the trip, analysts say. PDC's hottest news this year is about cloud computing -- vital to enterprises, but not exactly sexy stuff.

So is this Microsoft's Waterloo? Will it become the next IBM -- crucially important to businesses but an afterthought for consumers?

"Microsoft is at a transition point, and there is a risk of that happening," says Al Hilwa, analyst at IDC. "But Microsoft cares much more about consumers than IBM ever did. It's in its DNA, and it understands that it is necessary to stay relevant. I don't see Microsoft ever abandoning consumers."

As Apple has proven, success in consumer products can fuel explosive growth. Apple surpassed Microsoft's market value earlier this year, and is on pace to eclipse the company in sales for 2010.

And if Microsoft cedes consumer ground, it risks its enterprise stronghold. Businesses are becoming more willing to allow employees to use their personal devices for work purposes, and a growing number of those gizmos are Macs, iPads, iPhones and Android smartphones.

So it's up to Microsoft to turn that around by being a leader, rather than a follower, in the consumer market.

Windows Phone 7 is a good start. Internet Explorer 9 has some exciting new features that other browsers lack. And Xbox's controllerless Kinect -- the first of its kind -- is coming this holiday season.

Microsoft just has to hope it's not too late.

Baldwin Brothers

Polly Talbott

204 Spring St, Marion, MA 02738

Ph (508) 748-0800

Facsimile (508) 748-0806

www.baldwinbrothersinc.com

 

This message contains information from Baldwin Brothers, Inc. that may be confidential.  This message is directed only to the individual or entity named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, please be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this email is prohibited.  If you received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the message and any attachments.

Tuesday, October 26, 2010

Lynas Corp – Downgrading to N from OW - JPMorgan

Lynas Corp – Downgrading to N from OW - Following a period of very strong share price out-performance, we downgrade our recommendation on LYC to Neutral and retain our $1.71 Jun11 price target. Since late Jun10, LYC’s share price has risen 184%, compared to a 5% rise in the ASX/S&P 200 and a 10% rise in the ASX/S&P 200 Materials Index. The key driver of LYC’s share price rise has been the sharp increase in rare earths prices. LYC’s Mt Weld rare earths basket price has risen more than 240% from US$17.42/kg as at 28 Jun10 to US$59.77/kg as at 25 Oct10. In turn, the key reason behind the rare earths price increases have been actions by Chinese authorities to reduce China’s rare earths export quotas and initiatives to consolidate domestic supply. On this front, we wait for news of China's export quota for 1H CY11, due to be announced as early as Nov10 or as late as Jan11. Reid https://mm.jpmorgan.com/PubServlet?action=open&doc=GPS-492872-0.pdf

Monday, October 25, 2010

Monday Meeting 10/25

Monday Meeting 10/25
Thursday:
TIPS
Brazil fixed income rule for foreign investors
Consumer stocks
Portfolio Allocation Review

Ricki Otts' presentation on the Gulf spill very worth watching.

WES possible new MLP name. Yielding between 6-7%.

BRAC portfolio review

Brazil USD linked bond

DHR one stand out to the earnings call, wage pressure in EM markets.

Arms: Narrow trading range and low volatility suggest a resistance level has been reached. Very little would cause a criss of the MACD-a negative signal. Sees a turn lower, catalyst would be a rise in the dollar, US and world markets appear to be handcuffed to the value of the dollar.

Portfolio allocation review

Barron's: A Private Party

Big companies are quickly adopting new computer networks known as "private clouds." That may mean trouble for major tech suppliers.


IT TURNS OUT THIS CLOUD has a dark side for technology vendors–and their shareholders.

Corporate adoption of efficiency-enhancing, virtualized computer networks, known as "private" clouds, is going so well that big companies may be ready for the next phase of cloud computing years sooner than either Wall Street or Silicon Valley expected. That's not a welcome development for the technology suppliers that sell Corporate America hardware and software because the next step is the outsourcing of many data-processing services. In other words, corporate customers gradually will be cutting back on big-ticket items and redirecting smaller amounts of money to computer-services providers.

"It's possible that we could see another nuclear winter in tech spending," says Walter Price Jr., who has been managing technology funds for more than 25 years.

The consensus has been that big, global companies, already sitting on record mounds of cash and reporting improved revenues and profits, would steadily increase their spending over the next few years as the recovery gradually gained steam. Information-technology stocks would enjoy the ride.

But that's not really happening. Even without the effects of cloud computing, Goldman Sachs now sees 2009's declining global information-technology sales followed by about 5% growth this year and 3% in 2011 as a subpar recovery takes hold (see chart nearby). Price contends that it could get worse than that. "What's coming is a secular decline in tech spending," he says. "We are headed to an environment where it will be difficult for [tech vendors] to keep revenues growing."

Companies Loosen Purse Strings—Just a Bit

Although spending on technology has rebounded from 2009's lows, it's not expected to sustain strong growth levels into 2011. In the meantime, IT-industry shares have beaten the markets.

[tech_t2]

[tech_t]

Price expects the technology portion of capital-spending budgets to fall as corporate networks head into this new stage–known as "public" cloud computing–in which more tasks are handled, possibly by a new group of technology outfits, for a fee.

To date, Amazon.com (ticker: AMZN) is the leading computer-service provider followed by Google(GOOG) and Microsoft (MSFT). There are numerous companies that provide software-as-a-service from the cloud such as Intuit (INTU). Those with the most to lose in the coming transition are Hewlett-Packard (HPQ), Dell (DELL), Oracle (ORCL), Cisco Systems (CSCO) and IBM (IBM).

The notion of cloud computing comes from the interconnection of computer-data centers via a network connected to the Internet. New virtualization technology is pushing this trend. Server-virtualization software, especially that sold by market-leader VMWare (VMW), allows one computer to take the place of several machines by running more than one operating system and then allocating resources where they're needed to increase efficiency. In short, it takes fewer machines, fewer employees, less electricity and less software to do the same job. The rapid growth of VMWare and its cloud-enabling technology is another sign of companies' speedy adoption of the concept.

Thomas Reis

A private cloud generally is owned and operated by the company that deploys it. The ultimate transition to a public cloud means that almost all its information-technology operations could be managed by a third party that owns clusters of hugely powerful data centers. That is where Amazon and Google come in. In its simplest form, a company would access its data when it wanted through the Internet, the same way a consumer can now access Turbo Tax software without having to store all the information on his own computer.

The process is well under way. According to a 2009 survey of technology vendors by independent research boutique Primary Global Research, at least 10% of those polled said the cloud would be part of their strategy by 2011. Yet the firm now estimates that 80% of its survey group already are working on an implementation plan that includes cloud computing. Among the early adopters of private cloud technologies have beenRevlon (REV) and Charles Schwab (SCHW). In Europe, the pace is even quicker. Royal Dutch Shell(RDS) has signed a five-year contract to shift its data centers in the U.S., Netherlands and Malaysia to a public cloud run by a Deutsche Telekom unit.

Primary Global, says Chief Executive Unni Narayanan, was sufficiently impressed with the possibilities that it shifted its own human-resources function to a privately held cloud company called HireDesk. Primary Global had paid about $100,000 to install its existing HR software and then roughly $15,000 in annual maintenance. It now pays about $6,000 a year to access this information via HireDesk's cloud-computing operation.

Such economics, says Price, could mean the most dramatic transformation of enterprise technology in 20 years arrives ahead of schedule. It would be comparable to the disruption caused when client-server personal-computer systems surpassed mini-computers and big-iron mainframes. Think Wang, Digital Equipment Corp., Sperry and Burroughs.

In the very near term, companies will continue to invest in their own private cloud-computer systems. That will benefit the traditional tech behemoths that sell servers, storage, personal computers and business software, such as IBM (IBM); HP; Dell; Oracle and Cisco. But the markets already are starting to make longer term distinctions. With the exception of IBM, these stocks have been trading at depressed valuations because they are mature companies, says Paul Wick, technology-portfolio manager at Seligman Investments.

And the clock is ticking for the current giants. The ultimate "public-cloud" model is analogous to power utilities, where computing power would be sold based on usage and need.

Who's Gotten Ahead in the Clouds?

Here are some of RCM portfolio manager Walter Price's top cloud-computing picks.

RecentMarket2010E2011E
Company/TickerPrice*Value (bil)Revenue (mil)EPS EPSP/E
Software As A Servicer
Concur / CNQR$48.40$2.5$293$0.76$0.9550.9
Intuit / INTU46.1214.03,8002.412.7316.9
Salesforce.com / CRM105.3014.01,6001.181.5269.1
Success Factors / SFSF24.991.81990.010.11219.2
Computer Services
Amazon.com  / AMZN164.9774.033,0002.593.5846.1
Google / GOOG611.99195.02,20028.6733.2218.4

*As of 10/21. E=Estimate. CNQR:For fiscal years ending Sept. 2010 and Sept. 2011. INTU:For fiscal years ending in July 2011 and July 2012.

Source:Thomson Reuters

Primary Global's Narayanan agrees that today's enterprise-technology vendors are at risk of becoming obsolete. "There is a constant tension between addressing short-term immediate problems versus directing resources to potentially huge untapped markets," he says. "And so, technologists vacillate between tactical thinking for today and strategic planning for tomorrow."

Portfolio manager Price is betting that the global scale of Amazon and Google gives them an advantage; their data-center facilities already dot the world, offering the potential for high-quality services, analytics and applications at lower costs. Their shares are pricey, thanks to their core e-commerce and advertising businesses, trading at forward price/earnings ratios of 46 and 18, respectively. But Price argues that investors have to pay up for growth to own the industry leaders. Amazon and Google shares were trading last week around 169.13 and 612.53, respectively.

A new generation of Silicon Valley start ups, such as social-networking and mobile-services companies, have integrated Amazon and Google cloud services into their offerings. As they grow, Amazon and Google will grow, too. Price thinks Amazon's market-cap of $69 billion could grow as much as 45% to $100 billion in just two to three years.

Microsoft has the heft, engineering prowess and potential scale to compete, but it started after Amazon and Google and faces headwinds in its other businesses. Microsoft's Azure unit isn't aimed at offering infrastructure to users the way Amazon and Google do, but is offering a platform as a service where customers can host myriad Web-based software applications. IBM is another possible contender, though to date it's focused on Web services that can facilitate the building of private-cloud networks, Narayanan says.

For client-server era giants like Cisco, Oracle and HP to get in the game, it will probably require some key acquisitions, Price thinks. As their customers turn to the cloud, these fierce competitors will be fighting over a shrinking enterprise pie, increasingly selling their servers, storage and networking gear to what's expected to be just a handful of major cloud-service providers.

Potential targets could include publicly held cloud computing pure-plays, such Rackspace Hosting(RAX), Terremark Worldwide (TMRK), and Savvis (SVVS), says Global's Narayanan. These companies started largely as places where customers could locate their data centers cheaply without having to own the space. They are now tackling the tougher task of evolving beyond this commodity-type business to become value-added cloud-services operations.

But there are a bevy of privately held and well-funded cloud-services outfits that might make for attractive takeover targets, including Joyent and Go Grid. Joyent is a six-year old San Francisco company that provides cloud services to thousands of customers, including professional networking-service Linked In.Intel (INTC) and Peter Thiel, a backer of Facebook, provided venture backing. Go Grid is a smaller private company.

Price's favorite picks to become big winners in the cloud era are software-as-a-service outfits companies that host business software applications and provide them as a subscription service via the Internet.

The poster child is Salesforce.com (CRM), which Price thinks can more than double its $14 billion market valuation to $30 billion in three years. He also predicts that trailing annual revenues of about $1.46 billion can grow 30% a year. Salesforce provides on-demand customer-relations management software applications. Salesforce shares, which trade about 69 times forward-earnings, changed hands at 105 last week.

Price is also high on the growth prospects of Intuit, the creator of Quicken personal-finance software; is poised to become the cloud-based provider of accounting and other financial software to small businesses ("Small Is Bountiful for Intuit,Barron's, Sept. 13). He thinks Intuit's market cap of $14 billion can increase 30% over the next two-three years. Shares were trading about 17 times forward earnings last week, closing Friday at 47.21.

Two other software-as-a-service companies to watch are SuccessFactors (SFSF) and Concur Technologies (CNQR). Price views them as niche players in enterprise applications that could do well in their relatively narrow categories. SuccessFactors, which provides business execution applications such as those used for employee performance, is also pricey with a P/E ratio of 219. Shares closed Friday at 25.87. In a recent story, Barron's found the pricing too rich ("A Poor Review for a Highflying Stock," Oct. 11). Concur provides expense-reporting applications on demand, eliminating the need for paper and pencil reports ("Reining in T&E Costs, the Easy Way,Barron's, July 19). The stock was changing hands at 49.14 at Friday's close, or about 51 times forward-looking earnings.

With the exception of Microsoft, Intuit and Google, these are all pricey stocks. Investors may have to pay up if they want to benefit from companies' zeal to cut their information-technology costs. Remember, this decade's tech star could emerge from this group.